I found many of Saffer’s arguments on the vitalness of, and recommendations for, ideation processes to be genuintely stimulating and useful. Now that I think back on it, I’m fairly certain that the vast majority of the time I’ve been in any kind of brainstorming–or other kind of ideation–session, the I’ve been in has done it quite wrong. Reminders like “At this point in the design process, quantity–not quality–is what matters the most” (p. 114) are more than necessary. There’s only so much one can resist being concerned about being judged for offering up crazy- or stupid-sounding ideas off the top of one’s head, of course, but I guess it just takes the right group/kind of people (perhaps those who’ve established a good amount of trust with one another first) to do this kind of concept creation well. Reading this chapter actually reminded me of the first time I ever heard the term “brainstorming”–by a “Gifted and Talented” (i.e. smart-or-otherwise-talented-kid class I had for one class period a day) teacher in 6th grade who had our small group. I think that might have been my purest experience with the practice. I also really liked the notion of “How would it work if it was magic?” (p. 119).
I found Saffer’s interview with Larry Tesler pretty interesting, too. Tesler’s positions sound almost like zen (or at least more zen then I’d been imagining the field to be)–humble, embracing a healthy amount of selflessness, a kind of compassionate, verbally economical.